North Bay Regional Center

2001 Performance Contract

End-of-the-Year Report

 

North Bay Regional Center (NBRC) - Promoting Opportunities, Supporting Choices for People with Developmental Disabilities in Solano, Sonoma and Napa Counties.

We believe that all people with developmental disabilities should have the same opportunities as are available to all other citizens. In keeping with this premise, it is the philosophy of NBRC that its efforts be directed to promoting normalization, least restrictive alternative and dignity of risk for citizens with developmental disabilities and their families in Napa, Solano and Sonoma Counties.

January 31, 2002

 

North Bay Regional Center

2001 Performance Contract End-of-the-Year Report

Table of Contents

 

NBRC Strategic Development Process

Message from the Executive Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

NBRC Imperatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

The Purpose of North Bay Regional Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Values Explanation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

North Bay Regional Center Strategic Development Plan-2001 to 2006 . . . . . 8

NBRC Strategic Development Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Unmet Needs Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

30 Year Celebration of Community Partnership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

NBRC Key Emphasis Areas

A. Living Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

B. Family Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

C. Education and Lifelong Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

D. Work and Leisure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

E. Prevention and Early Intervention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

F. Self-Determination Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

G. Service Planning and Coordination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

H. Health and Well-Being . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

I. Administration and Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

Appendix

The NBRC Wellness Team 2001 Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

The Deaf and Hard of Hearing Focus Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

The Sexual Assault Prevention Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

The Regional Special Needs Disaster Preparedness Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

The Aging Population Focus Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

Community Action Now and the NBRC Shareholders in Policymaking . . . . 58

The Mental Health Continuous Quality Improvement Group . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

The Spanish Resolution Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

The Department of Developmental Services Strategic Plan for 2001-2006 . 59

The CA State Council on Developmental Disabilities 2002-2006 State Plan 59

Performance Indicators Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

Questionnaire submitted to area State Legislators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

Senator Wesley Chesbro’s response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

What you can do . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

Questionnaire: Now it is your turn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

 

We proudly submit North Bay Regional Center’s 2001 Performance Contract End-of-Year Report for your review and approval.

We have integrated our agency’s goals and key emphasis areas, our continuous quality improvement initiatives, and our staff’s Performance Incentive Plans in this document. The satisfaction survey data included continues to be collected by an independent consultant firm in order to maximize objectivity. Internally, the data is now being broken down by county so that we can be more responsive to expressed needs or concerns. We have included selected comments from our satisfaction surveys in this report. We take these survey responses as our marching orders for developing new continuous quality improvement initiatives and agency goals. This requires flexibility and responsiveness, and continual reexamination of our organization. There are, of course, multiple factors, which influence satisfaction. In tough budget years, such as the one we are facing, it becomes even more difficult to meet increasing needs of our consumers and families. The data may reflect that. We are confident, however, that after over five years of conducting satisfaction surveys our data indicates accurate trends, is stable, and is statistically reliable. While we are pleased that in no area does satisfaction drop below 58%, and in some areas is as high as 92%, we will always pursue excellence. In areas where satisfaction has decreased, or is less than our goal, we will, through our focus groups and Strategic Development Committee, develop innovative efforts to improve our services.

Our determination to include parents and consumers in this process has become fierce. We are committed to the fact that quality is determined only by customers, though we struggle with the implications at times. Organizational changes are not always enough. A spirit of cooperation has to be fostered in order to promote truthful debate and best decision-making. We strive to collaborate constructively with our shareholders in promoting a common purpose, sharing equally in the benefits, obligations, and challenges facing our service system. As you review this report, we are confident you will appreciate our enhanced spirit of community in the North Bay.

This report will be presented to our Board of Directors on February 6th for formal approval. It will then be widely distributed through hard copy, our email lists, and available on our website. It will certainly be the foundation for in-depth discussion over the next months, and we welcome your involvement in those forums. Please fill out the brief questionnaire at the end of this document to convey how this report can be more useful to you in future years. We sincerely appreciate and value your comments.

Sincerely yours,

Nancy E. S. Gardner
Executive Director
North Bay Regional Center
1/23/02

NORTH BAY REGIONAL CENTER
I M P E R A T I V E S

1. Safety (Clients and Staff.)

2. Controlling the Budget.

3. Compliance with all Laws.

4. Systematic Documentation.

5. Compliance with Agreement with the Union.

6. Community Peace.

7. Adequate Staff, Space and Equipment to Operate. 

THE PURPOSE OF NORTH BAY REGIONAL CENTER

The purpose of North Bay Regional Center is to assist people with developmental disabilities or at risk for developmental disabilities in the North Bay Area to obtain services and supports they need to live as other people live in the community. We strive to follow these values in this endeavor:

VALUES:

Support Choices

Promote Prevention

Advocate Same Freedoms and Responsibilities

Promote Equal Opportunity

Respect Diversity

Promote Life in the Mainstream

Recognize the Dignity of Risk through Least Restrictive Supports

Promote Partnership

Focus on the Family

Promote Innovation

Foster Leadership

Promote Health and Safety

VALUES EXPLANATION:

Support Choices: Clients and families should have choices in the types of support that best suit their needs and preferences.

Promote Prevention: Providing services as early as possible often avoids bigger problems and costlier solutions later on.

Advocate Same Freedom and Responsibilities: People with developmental disabilities should participate in community life as do people without identified disabilities. They should have the same legal protections and obligations as do other citizens.

Promote Equal Opportunity: People with developmental disabilities should have the chance to pursue the same life goals in work, relationships, leisure pursuits and personal development as other people.

Respect Diversity: Services should be provided in a way that honors differences among people and families in culture, religion, disability, ethnic background, sexual preference and gender.

Promote Life in the Mainstream: Services should be designed to integrate people with developmental disabilities into typical community life and avoid segregation by disability.

Recognize the Dignity of Risk through Least Restrictive Supports: Living life in the typical community involves risks. People with developmental disabilities should not be denied freedom in the name of protection. Services should provide enough support to encourage individual growth and honor personal freedom while addressing health and safety in the same way as is done for those who do not have identified disabilities.

Promote Partnership: Working together in a spirit of partnership will overcome many obstacles as everyone looks for ways to insure success for the benefit of clients and families. North Bay Regional Center seeks to work cooperatively with all people and organizations involved in supporting clients and families.

Focus on the Family: People live in the context of family - those who know and care about the person. Services should encourage a nurturing family environment through honoring family choices and structure.

Promote Innovation: Services improve through acting on suggestions from clients, families and colleagues. Based on careful listening, we constantly look for better ways to work with each other and provide top-quality services and supports to people with developmental disabilities and their families.

Foster Leadership: Development and encouragement of leadership is key to advocacy for people with developmental disabilities in all areas of the system of services: local, regional, statewide and nationwide. Leadership is not dependent on rank, but on knowledge, motivation, commitment and results.

Promote Health and Safety: People with developmental disabilities should have access to high quality services that recognize basic and special health and safety needs. They also need training in how to meet their health and safety needs.

 

North Bay Regional Center Strategic Development Plan

2001 to 2006

Continue to create relevant information streams for all shareholders.

Continue to develop and enhance educational and training modalities for all shareholders.

Continue to nurture shareholder partnerships and collaboration.

Continue to advocate for adequate work force wages and benefits.

Continue to improve our ability to meet the needs of the people we serve while providing cost effective services.

Continue to refine our unmet needs processes and communicate the value of those needs that are being met.

Continue to develop future leadership in the field of developmental disabilities.

 

NBRC STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

 

 

Notes on our North Bay Regional Center Strategic Development Plan:

Our shareholders are:

a. Our consumers and their families.

b. Our NBRC personnel.

c. Our service provider community.

d. Local agencies who also serve our consumers and families, such agencies as local mental health, schools, licensing agencies, children and adult protective services, advocacy groups, law enforcement, emergency relief services, etc.

e. The other twenty Regional Centers.

f. State and Federal departments and agencies, such as the Department of Developmental Services, the Department of Rehabilitation, Health and Human Services, etc.

g. Our legislators.

h. Our community-at-large.

If you have comments about the plan and in particular if you would like to be involved in future planning, please contact Richard Ruge at (707) 256-1271 or email richardr@nbrc.net.

As you read the following report, you may identify issues, trainings, focus groups or email lists that you may want to join. We encourage you to do so.

UNMET NEEDS PROCESS

NBRC Client Case Coordinators are at the center of the critical interface between consumer and agencies who serve the consumer. Client Case Coordinators are often the first to know when consumer’s needs have changed, either individually or as a part of a growing trend. It is important to have a systematic process that encourages the capturing of this valuable service planning resource and improve shareholder satisfaction with the case management process by developing relevant services.

North Bay Regional Center will be reviewing its current Unmet Needs Process to greater facilitate, if needed, information sharing between resource developers, Client Program Coordinators and consumers about unmet needs. The feedback may take several forms, i.e. individualized feedback via email, group feedback at staff meetings, or a page on our website developed to track unmet needs so that the community could see what was happening to certain issues. If an unmet need is identified that is beyond the scope of NBRC, we could identify political action groups that might be working on it from a larger systems perspective. This process will be designed with support from resource developers, Client Program Coordinators, and families so that it will be user friendly and accessible to our community.

For further information, contact Deborah Scholey at (707) 256-1280 or email deborahs@nbrc.net.

30 YEAR CELEBRATION OF COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP:

to honor community collaboration by celebrating together, side by side

June 1, 2002 - from 2:00 to 8:00 PM

on the Great Lawn area of Cline Cellars in Sonoma, California

North Bay Regional Center is highlighting thirty years of community contributions by people with developmental disabilities, family members, service providers, volunteers, legislators, staff, and others with a celebration of community partnership. The 30th anniversary event is a celebration of thirty years of progress, team building, resource development, community outreach, support, empowerment, and community integration. It is a positive event celebrating the promotion of opportunities for people with developmental disabilities and special needs, and in assuring community awareness about those opportunities. With increased collaboration between shareholders, we build on our resources, share in our successes, and dream our vision for the future.

A consumer panel of seven creative adults from Sonoma County is providing input to the event plan. Their ideas and suggestions are incorporated into the overall plan. Community input and participation is being solicited through invitations for community service providers to engage in displays, exhibits, logo selection, activities, games, art shows, and more. A core workgroup of NBRC staff are focusing attention and energy into making the 30th anniversary celebration a success for the expected 1,500 guests. At the event we are planning a consumer art show, community and NBRC exhibits, music, magic, appetizers, dinner, drinks, commemorative glassware, a raffle and balloon pops, a live auction, and more.

To offset costs, keep admission prices affordable, and fundraise for people with special needs, a major focus is donation recruitment. Donations are needed in the form of in-kind services or goods, cash, time, and prizes of any type. Prizes are being used for the raffle, balloon pops, and live auction. Donation recruitment can occur by staff, board members, and others by contacting local businesses of which they are a customer/patron; or by sending formal letters to a specific category grouping. Prizes can be of value from $5 to $1000s. A donation of time can be utilized in staffing event components on the day of the celebration. Donation recruitment also serves as community outreach and education to our business community, by increasing awareness about the regional center, its resources, its shareholders, and its consumers.

Some of the planned scheduled event activities are:

Welcome and Keynote presentations

Artist award

Caribbean steel drum band

Contemporary recorder music

Strolling entertainers

High-energy dance band and lawn dancing

Barbecued dinner

If you would like to volunteer, exhibit, donate, or recruit prize donations, please contact Kathy Newman at (707) 256-1224.

 

NBRC KEY EMPHASIS AREAS

A . L I V I N G O P T I O N S

2 0 0 1

Living Options Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve Adult Consumer Satisfaction with Home

Objective 1a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 7 surveys since 1996. Survey results show a 70% very satisfied rating.

 

Selected comments from survey:

At the block parties in my neighborhood I am in charge of picking out the music. I am the DJ.

I would like to live closer to my family.

I want to stay with my mom.

I would like to have my own home.

I would like my own room.

I would like to live in a closer community where people look out for each other. Here people keep to themselves.

I'm happy that I will have my own place and a roommate, but I worry about my parents. They are going into assisted living.

I like living in the country where it's quiet.

The staff here changes too much.

Living alone is lonely. It's too quiet. I have one friend. I mostly watch TV.

I want to live close to the bowling alley.

 

Objective 1b: Expand housing options for people with developmental disabilities by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective.

NBRC established a Living Arrangements Committee in each office and were able to establish eight new level 4 care homes.

NBRC has also established three new non-ambulatoy senior homes.

NBRC is currently developing a Fred Finch program and a Telecare program which should be completed in 2002. These two projects will address the critical need for sophisticated treatment options for our adult and adolescent consumers with dual diagnosis. The number of unmet needs in this area submitted by CPC’s and out of area placement requests reveal that this trend is statewide. It can also serve as a model for other regional centers to duplicate.

Goal 2: Improve Family Satisfaction with Residential Services

Objective 2a: Complete a family satisfaction survey by 6/30/01 and 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 9 surveys since 1996. Survey results show a very high 92% satisfaction rating.

 

Selected comments from survey:

  • These people need to be paid better to increase their retention or increase fringe benefits. The home is not in great shape. It needs many home improvements. No roommates would be better.

  • His residential services and supports are outstanding.

  • She has gained weight in the last year. . . . . I am seriously concerned with her health.

  • When I want him to come for the weekend sometimes they refuse because they want him to stay for two nights, but its too hard for me. They said that overnight is not worth it for their trips.

  • Larger bedrooms would be nice.

  • More assistance with doing activities related to exercise, transporting, swimming, walking, biking.

  • I cannot visit her apartment as I am in a wheelchair. I wish she was on the ground floor, but in the same complex.

 

Objective 2b: Improve family satisfaction with residential services by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective. A number of Sonoma County residential homes closed in 2001. Everyone dislocated was successfully maintained in the community and there were no developmental center admissions as a result.

The North Bay Housing Coalition (NBHC) continued to meet throughout 2001 and accomplished the following objectives:

Grant from NBRC to NBHC for support for Project Coordinator to carryout housing goals of the Coalition.

NBHC submitted two grant applications to the Department of Developmental Services. One for capacity building and one for housing production. Approval pending at this time.

NBHC initiated a newsletter with a circulation of approximately 1700 to disseminate information regarding housing issues to constituency.

NBHC is a current grant recipient from State Council on Developmental Disabilities for assisting people with developmental disabilities and their families in acquiring housing. Community college course curriculum developed and implemented in all three counties. Curriculum adapted for use statewide. Individual housing consultations provided to families.

NBHC current grant recipient with Burbank Housing Foundation to set-aside low cost housing units for people with developmental disabilities in new housing developments.

NBHC encouraging landlords to accept Section 8 participants through assisting landlords to meet requirements and to complete paperwork.

NBHC provided input to Housing Authorities regarding the housing needs of people with developmental disabilities.

NBHC provided information to NBRC CPC's regarding housing issues.

NBHC exploring use of Community Development Block Grants to establish a fund to assist people with developmental disabilities with down payments to purchase housing.

NBHC meeting with Habitat for Humanity Fairfield chapter to explore working with a person with a developmental disability to acquire a home.

NBHC meeting with Fannie Mae as first step in starting a "Bay Area Home Choice Coalition" to support people with developmental disabilities in acquiring their own homes.

Objective 2c: Advocate for direct care staff stability and qualifications (via a living wage) by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective. NBRC community took a leadership role in the ARCA Grass Roots Day, sending more letters and more consumers and personnel to 2001 Grass Roots than any other area. This objective will remain a NBRC focus until there is direct care staff stability and until there is adequate work force living wages and benefits.

2 0 0 2

Living Options Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve shareholder satisfaction with living options.

Objective 1a: Complete an adult consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/02.

Baseline: 7 surveys.

Objective 1b: Complete a family satisfaction survey by 2/31/02.

Baseline: 9 surveys.

Objective 1c: Improve housing options for people with developmental disabilities by 12/31/02.

Baseline: Four initiatives:

  • Continue Housing Coalition meetings through 12/31/02.
  • Continue monthly Living Arrangement Committee meetings identifying residential unmet needs through 12/31/02.
  • Create an instruction manual of the placement procedures when a child is considered for placement by 12/31/02.
  • Continue development of the Telecare and Fred Finch projects into fully operating facilities for children and adults with dual diagnosis by 7/1/02.

Homes developed in 2001:

Total of new home development in 2001 is twelve.

Jan to June - seven new level 4i homes - homes were opened in all three counties serving adults, children and elderly. These were a result of the RFP in June 2000.

Jan to June - one new level 3 children’s home with non-ambulatory beds.

Jan to June - one new level 3 adult facility.

Jan to June - one new level 3 home for elderly - with non-ambulatory beds.

July to December – two new Level 3 adult homes for elderly with non-ambulatory beds.

Residential level adjustments in Adult homes in 2001:

Two homes from level 2 to 3.

One home from level 4d to 4f.

One home from level 2 to 4e.

One home from level 3 to 4c.

One home from level 4a to 4d.

Residential level adjustments in homes for children in 2001:

One home from level 2 to 3.

One home from level 4a to 4i.

One home from level 4g to 4i.

The Quality Assurance Unit also meets quarterly with Community Care Licensing and Health Care Licensing to discuss quality assurance issues in both CCL homes and ICFS. There has been considerable attention given to the process and procedure involved in careproviders requesting level increases for their homes, and a procedure has been established which clearly spells out what needs to be documented for that to be considered.

Living Arrangements Committee: The Lanterman act encourages "opportunities for individuals with developmental disabilities to be integrated into the mainstream of life in their home communities, including supported living and other appropriate community living arrangements." A high priority is also placed on providing opportunities for children with developmental disabilities to live with their families.

To ensure that a complete range of options is presented to every consumer at NBRC who is in need of a new living arrangement, a committee was formed which meets monthly at each office to contribute to the person centered planning process and is responsible for assisting with follow-up recommendations. Committee members may include: Community Liaison, Community Resource Consultants - including a Quality Assurance Monitor, Nurse Consultant, Psychologist, Quality Assurance. Supervisor, etc.

 

B . F A M I L Y S U P P O R T

BACKGROUND: The issue of family support has been identified in surveys as very important for all families of consumers, whether their children are school age or adults. Family support refers to the basic services that enable a family to care for their disabled family member at home; these services may include respite, behavioral services, day programs, etc. Often in the past, parents have not always felt they were part of the decision making process at NBRC.

The Family Support Committee was formed two years ago as a subcommittee of the Strategic Planning Committee. One of the first things the Committee did was to create a mission statement: The Family Support Committee, comprised of families, agency staff, and vendors will provide ongoing advice, education, information, and support and will ensure that family voices are incorporated into the development, revision, and implementation of NBRC policies and procedures. It is imperative that consumers, their families, and their support team be a part of the decision making process at any organization or agency that affects their lives. The NBRC Family Support Group is one way for you as a family member to be involved in NBRC decision making.

LONG RANGE GOALS: What we want to accomplish in the next three to five years:

Parents would be involved every time a new procedure is developed or an existing one is revised if the procedure pertains to family support issues.

The committee will continue to generate or encourage creative options for services through NBRC.

The committee will be an available resource to NBRC resource development as it impacts families and family support.

Committee members will educate others about the committee’s existence through newsletters, networking, etc.

The committee will serve as a forum where parents and others can express concerns or make suggestions regarding family support services.

2 0 0 1

Family and Support Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve family satisfaction with family supports.

Objective 1a: Complete a family satisfaction survey by 6/30/01 and 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 9 surveys since 1996.

 

Selected comments from the survey:

Day camp. Summer Camp. Unaware of where camps are. Finances.

I need more information about the help that I could get for me and my kid.

Qualified, trained, available respite workers!!! Big need! No training and referral agency in our county.

I would like my son to attend summer school.

Some activities that would provide physical activities and challenge.

Music and speech therapy. OT. Lift to transfer her.

Psychiatric and psychological services for my son. He is hard to diagnose.

Lovaas method behavior therapy.

He could use a person he could communicate with other than his parents and work people. Someone who knows sign language and could take him shopping etc. and be a special friend. Don’t know who to ask or approach.

More advocacy for clients long-range future.

More P.T. and a mentor, someone to interact with instead of only family.

I need to know how we'll ever get our five-year-old autistic son to the dentist. Lack of dentists' experience with autism.

I need financial support due to the fact that our family member is in need of his parents more than most six year olds, and I wish I could work part time to be more supportive to him.

Speech and language. OT. School cannot provide enough time. NBRC will not supplement what schools cover.

Transportation, assistance with learning how to use public transportation.

Objective 1b: Improve availability and accessibility of resource information for families by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed -ongoing objective.

The Family Support Committee met on a monthly basis.

The Family Support committee identified over forty procedures in NBRC’s procedure manual that were family focused and requested that these procedures be posted to NBRC’s website. These procedures and other family related links are now on the NBRC website.

NBRC purchased a literature rack on the recommendation of the committee, and the Children’s Resource Consultant keeps it stocked with family and consumer friendly material, as well as NBRC and DDS brochures.

Members of the Family Support committee did reports for the NBRC Board and for CSSG (NBRC’s supervisors) and made recommendations to the Strategic Planning process.

Objective 1c: Increase inclusion in after-school daycare and other generic programs by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed -ongoing objective.

The Family Support Committee co-sponsored with Matrix and Area IV Board, a tri-county social recreation resource fair that was geared to families with children in the transitional age group, ages 14-22. This fair occurred in April of 2001 at Napa Valley College.

Objective 1d: Improve accessibility to respite and daycare services for families by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed -ongoing objective.

Parents participated on a Respite Committee, which resulted in revisions to the NBRC’s respite worksheet.

2 0 0 2

Family and Support Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve family satisfaction with family supports.

Objective 1a: Complete a family satisfaction survey by 12/31/02.

Baseline: 9 surveys

Objective 1b: Improve availability and accessibility of resource information for families by 12/31/02.

Baseline: Six initiatives are described below:

Assist the Filipino community (consumers, their families, RSPs) in Solano County by conducting a regional center system training, creating a support group through 12/31/02.

Increase empowerment of Hispanic Families in collaboration with community agencies in Napa & Solano Counties, by holding a Spring Resource Fair, hosting a workshop on Future Transition Planning through 12/31/02.

Improve services to Latino community in Sonoma County through coordination, outreach and parent empowerment. through 12/31/02.

Another tri-county social recreation resource fair is planned for the spring of 2002.

The Family Support Committee will conduct more outreach to Spanish-speaking families and other families whose primary language is not English.

The Family Support Committee will continue with monthly meetings and actively work on a Family Support section of the NBRC website through 12/31/02.

HOW TO GET INVOLVED: If you are a consumer family member and are interested in participating on the Family Support Group committee, please contact the chairperson, Catherine Alexander at (707) 256-1109 or CatherineA@nbrc.net.

C . E D U C A T I O N A N D L I F E L O N G L E A R N I N G

LONG RANGE GOALS: What we want to accomplish in the next three to five years: A key component of our Long Range Strategic Development Plan is to continue to develop and enhance educational and training modalities for all shareholders. This issue was voiced of particular concern by family members during our September 2001 Strategic Development public meeting. Please let us know what training or education is of interest to you by completing the questionnaire at the back of this report.

2 0 0 1

Education and Lifelong Learning Goals and Objectives for:

Goal 1: Improve Adult Consumer Satisfaction with Education

Objective 1a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 7 surveys since 1996.

Selected comments from the survey:

I'm tired of getting up early. I would like a real job.

My favorite teacher left.

I take PE which I like a lot.

I love my computer class at the college. I would like to learn how to read.

My high school didn't challenge me enough. I am looking forward to junior college.

A few people cause me problems.

Objective 1b: Improve adult consumer satisfaction with education by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective.

NBHC is a current grant recipient from State Council on Developmental Disabilities for assisting people with developmental disabilities and their families in acquiring housing. Community college course curriculum developed and implemented in all three counties. Curriculum adapted for use statewide. Individual housing consultations provided to families.

NBRC personnel began participated on Santa Rosa Junior College Special Needs committee through 12/31/01.

 

Goal 2: Improve Family Satisfaction with Education

Objective 2a: Complete a family satisfaction survey by 6/30/01 and 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 9 surveys since 1996.

Selected comments from the survey:

Tutoring, if available.

Follow through from schools regarding IEP issues, specific training. Teaching quality needs to be better.

My son needs extended school hours.

We'd like him to have more APE and Physical Therapy at school.

There is too much down time. I think it would be better if the time was used more for teaching or recreation (structured).

There have been too many teacher changes.

I don't know much about the program my family member attends.

Transportation. More speech, PE, PT and any OT.

With Preder Willi syndrome, the behavior is misunderstood sometimes. Our son is being bad, when sometimes it is not his fault, it is the syndrome.

Our school doesn't lack desire, but does lack resources.

More creativity in development of work options, more "thinking outside the box."

Better coordination between school and Regional Center, so if one is not providing the service the other one is. Now you can try to get the service from both and after the struggle between the two, maybe one will provide it.

She wants to learn to work computers, but there isn't a computer in her classroom.

Objective 2b: Improve parent advocacy in the schools by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective. For further information, see below.

Objective 2c: Improve communication with educational partners by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective. For further information, see below.

NBRC personnel participated on the Community Advisory Committee for the Napa Valley Unified School District and the Napa County Superintendent of Schools NBRC personnel participated in the Napa Transition Fair.

NBRC personnel participated on Solano County and Upper Solano County SELPA groups.

Objective 2d: Improve the transitional process for students and their families by 12/31/01.

results: Completed-ongoing objective. For further information, see below.

· NBRC participated in the Transition Fair.

2 0 0 2

Education and Lifelong Learning Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve shareholder satisfaction with education and lifelong learning.

Objective 1a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/02.

Baseline: 7 surveys.

Objective 1b: Complete a family satisfaction survey by 12/31/02.

Baseline: 9 surveys

Objective 1c: Improve consumer and family satisfaction with education by 12/31/02. This objective was changed from original 2002 Performance Contract Proposal to include satisfaction of families and all consumers, not just adult consumers.

Baseline: Two Initiatives:

NBRC personnel will continue their collaboration with the Educational System, Workability Project and community vendors through 12/31/02.

NBRC personnel will continue participation on Santa Rosa Junior College Special Needs committee.

Further information: The Santa Rosa Transition Unit has been working in collaboration with the Workability Project through SR City Schools on an outreach program for parents of children with developmental disabilities. Once a quarter, the Transition Team participates in a parent meeting at Montgomery High School. These meetings provide written information and pamphlets for the families as well as speakers.

At the first meeting, the parents told us what they wanted in the way of information for future planning. The second meeting, hosted a panel of speakers including: Kathy La Mar - Sonoma County Office of Education Principal, Robert Mattos and John McCue – Becoming Independent, and Brian Garlick – North Bay Industries.

The meetings have been well received by both families and school personnel. We average about 30 participants each meeting. The goal of these meetings is to create open communication with families, school personnel, and NBRC, and to give families a step-by-step process in which to make informed decisions regarding future planning needs for their children.

To learn more or to get more involved: Anyone interested in attending this group may contact Suzette Soviero (707) 569-2019, Heather Vail (707) 569-2060 or Pat Patel (707) 569-2044.

 

D . W O R K A N D L E I S U R E

2 0 0 1

Work and Leisure Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve shareholder satisfaction with consumer work opportunities

Objective 1a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 7 surveys since 1996.

Selected comments from the survey:

I would like a real job - not busy work.

I like janitorial, but I'd like more hours and more money.

I would like to learn the computer.

I love my job at Applebee's. I set up the tables.

My job is okay, but I would like it better if I did different things.

I love my job at Round Table.

I love my job at Straw Hat.

Being a stock clerk is boring after seven years.

My boss tells me I'm doing good.

Objective 1b: Improve staff and consumer accessibility to information regarding job vacancies and work wanted by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-on going objective.

A Day Program Transition Booklet was created. See further information below.

Objective 1c: Improve NBRC staff and consumer knowledge of Department of Rehabilitation work options by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-on going objective. See further information below.

Goal 2: Improve shareholder satisfaction with leisure activities.

Objective 2a: Improve NBRC staff and consumer knowledge of Life After Work Clubs for consumers by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed.

A 2001 Social Recreation Resource Fair was conducted.

Further Information: One NBRC personnel initiative in the Napa office included the posting of available jobs on the NBRC computer system and maintaining contact with vendors and supported employment agencies to post job openings. This included a Job Fair and Job Tours. This initiative also included continued attendance at the Mayors' Committees in Napa and Solano counties as related to promoting job opportunities, and events around Disability Awareness Month in October. There were employer recognition breakfasts in each county and a Vendor Fair held in Napa County on October 25th and in Solano County on November 1st. NBRC personnel presented trainings on Transition Planning, adult programs, and jobs to the teachers of the Solano County Special Education Department on October 2nd and the Fairfield Suisun Unified School District Special Educators on October 4th. Quarterly meetings of the Supported Employment Task Force for Solano County and Napa County occurred. Jobs and openings were posted on NBRC internal computer network and announced at various meetings. Activities related to job opportunities for our consumers were posted on the NBRC website. A NBRC representative also participated in monthly transition planning meetings of the Community Advisory Committee with the Napa Valley Unified School District and the Napa County SELPA.

NBRC maintains ongoing effort to make certain families, vendors, generic service agencies, CPC’s, etc. are aware of work and leisure options for our consumers. We will continue to update our internal data base and use our email system to ensure timely postings and adequate advertising of the kinds of jobs consumers are seeking or jobs consumers are requesting to be developed. Our ongoing effort also involves:

Training for CPCs in all counties on the referral process to supported employment programs, day programs, and the Department of Rehabilitation.

Continued job tours for consumers to see different jobs and program sites.

Regular attendance at community group activities such as the Mayors’ Committees in two counties and School District Consumer Advisory Committees.

Coordination and participation in the Transition Fairs held by the School Districts as well as parent training in Transition Planning held by Matrix.

To learn more or to get more involved: Contact Jim Kuehn at (707) 256-1247 or Kim Maassen at (707) 569-2034.

 

2 0 0 2

Work and Leisure Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve shareholder satisfaction with consumer work opportunities.

Objective 1a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/02.

Baseline: 7 surveys.

Objective 1b: Improve staff and consumer accessibility to information regarding job vacancies and work wanted by 12/31/02.

Baseline: Three initiatives:

Continue to publicize consumer job opportunities by internal NBRC electronic systems.

Video Taping of NPS/NVSS NBRC Team.

Consumer Satisfaction With Work initiative.

Objective 1c: Improve NBRC staff and consumer knowledge of Department of Rehabilitation work options by 12/31/02.

Baseline: One initiative:

Conduct CPC trainings of Department of Rehabilitation referral processes by 12/31/02.

Goal 2: Improve shareholder satisfaction with leisure activities.

Objective 2a: Improve accessibility to leisure activity resources by 12/31/02.

Baseline: Three initiatives:

Conduct at least one Social Recreation Resource Fair by 12/31/02.

Developing Stronger Relationships Through Recreation initiative.

Update information about adult services and after hours activities for Solano/Napa Counties on NBRC internal electronic system by 12/31/02.

Objective 2b: Initiate a Senior Friend-to-Friend pilot project in Solano/Napa Counties by 12/31/02.

Baseline: One initiative:

A Senior Friend-to-Friend pilot project will be initiated in Solano/Napa Counties by 12/31/02.

 

E . P R E V E N T I O N A N D E A R L Y I N T E R V E N T I O N

2 0 0 1

Prevention and Early Intervention Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve Family Satisfaction with Early Intervention

Objective 1a: Complete a family satisfaction survey by 6/30/01 and 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 10 surveys since 1996. Charts were produced for the Spring and Fall for Napa, Solano and Sonoma Counties and can be obtained by request.

Selected comments from the surveys:

We are very pleased with all the services received through NBRC. We are very blessed that NBRC is involved with assisting in our daughter's developmental needs. She has been in the program for a year now and has shown significant improvement. Thanks!

I have been very impressed with the quality of services. I am extremely grateful for the tremendous support, ideas, and accessibility of resources. This is an ESSENTIAL service.

My son is less than 24 months old. I feel that he is in need of speech therapy, because he is not making very many sounds. I feel I haven't been helped along to find some kind of speech help for my son.

We didn't have any choices in who our home visitor would be (due to a shortage of speech therapists), which was fine, but I was thinking that if we had required a service for which there were options, I wonder to what extent parents have a right to choice. For instance, is it like selecting a doctor, in which one usually looks into background/experience, maybe even meets the doctor before deciding. When you have someone coming inside your home for an hour a week, it seems important to make sure it will be a good match.

The best thing for my son and I has been the help we get regarding transportation to the needed appointments.

The best thing is that our daughter's therapy purchase orders are approved quickly to reduce any potential downtime.

I feel my child may not be where he is had he not had Early Intervention. He has made HUGE progress.

Having home-based speech services. It would have been difficult and probably not successful, if I had to take my child to a therapist's office. Also, my Coordinator was great.

I wish we could have more PT and that respite were more readily available. If more people knew about the program. I found out about it when I called the School District. But I told a couple of friends and they were able to get in.

Most of the people we've seen through your agency have been very good about bringing over cleaned toys. But one provider brought toys over that I was concerned if they had been cleaned after use with other children. This was at an age when my child was putting things in the mouth.

Services beyond three years of age. I feel with NBRC I have a safety net, if a need arises. After age three I feel we are on our own.

Objective 1b: Improve family access to Early Intervention service options by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed – ongoing objective.

The new Early Intervention Warm line Referral Coordinator has participated in both internal and community meetings in all three Counties. This has increased her resource knowledge base of service options for families who are seeking Early Intervention services.

An Early Intervention community contact list with sixty community providers and partners in Solano County has been compiled and distributed to community Early Start providers/vendors.

Objective 1c: Increase the number of vendors/service providers in the following areas by 12/31/01:

Bilingual services and support

Autism diagnosis and IDST

Home care nursing

Respite providers

Family counseling

2001 results: Completed – ongoing objective.

o Early Intervention continues to seek a bi-lingual Client Program Coordinator. Early Intervention has been able to identify two temporary bi-lingual support staff.

o NBRC’s Tri-County Early Intervention Group have identified Autism and IDST services as an area for improvement. Work groups in both Sonoma and Solano Counties have been convened to identify barriers and recommend a resolution plan. The focus is on both working with existing service providers and identifying new providers.

o The new Early Intervention nurse is working with existing Home Health agencies to identify more nursing resources. NBRC Early Intervention has begun discussion with Solano Partnership around accessing EPDST for home health nursing.

Goal 2: Improve Family Satisfaction with Transition

Objective 2a: Increase the number of children with NBRC eligibility determination before age three by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed – ongoing objective.

Early Intervention is tracking the number of intakes each month and the number completed by the 45 day time line. A work group has distributed a survey to Early Intervention Specialists and program partners regarding possible barriers to meeting time lines.

Early Intervention continues to track the number of cases closed at 3 and track barriers to meeting this time line.

The Tri-County Early Start group has been tracking transition for three year olds. To date, approximately 80% of three year olds have had their IEP completed by age three.

 

2 0 0 2

Prevention and Early Intervention Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve shareholder satisfaction with Early Intervention processes.

Objective. 1a: Complete a family satisfaction survey by 12/31/02.

Baseline: 10 surveys

Objective 1b: Improve family access to Early Intervention service options by 12/31/02.

Baseline: Four initiatives titled:

Shareholder Satisfaction with the Early Start Intake Process.

Early Intervention Transition Planning.

Intake Satisfaction Survey - Prevention and Early Intervention.

Early Intervention Resource & Referral.

Objective 1c: Improve the Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) referral process by 12/31/02.

Baseline: One initiative:

NBRC Napa personnel will identify and remove barriers that interfere with completing the IFSP by the 45th day after referral by 12/31/02.

F. SELF-DETERMINATION SUPPORT

2 0 0 1

Self Determination Support Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve Adult Consumer Satisfaction with Transportation

Objective 1a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 7 surveys since 1996.

Selected comments from the survey:

I like to go places.

I love taking the bus. I go everywhere on my own. I went to Rohnert Park to visit my friends.

The van driver is great.

I wish I could get out more.

It's a three hour round trip every day.

I know the buses and the drivers are nice. I take the Runabout to the college.

Sometimes the driver is in a hurry and doesn't stop.

The van is too noisy.

I would like to be able to drive.

Objective 1b: Improve consumer satisfaction with transportation by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective.

NBRC Consumer Advocate, in cooperation with local consumers and consumer advocates voiced the need for additional vans through the Napa County Paratransit Coordinating Council. The Council is holding a public hearing to determine if there are any private non-profit organizations available to provide the needed transportation. The chosen non-profit organization would be able to apply for federal grant funding for the purchase of additional vans. Adequate consumer transportation is a national systemic need.

 

Goal 2: Improve Adult Consumer Satisfaction with Opportunities to Make Choices

Objective 2a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/01

2001 results: Completed. 7 surveys since 1996.

Selected comments from the survey:

I like to stay home and watch TV.

The staff can't get away to take me to the movies. I would like to get out more.

I can swim at the Y whenever I want to. I can see my mom whenever I want to. I went to the Supported Life Conference. I might join People First.

The community needs to have more activities.

I like to work in the garden.

I get bored on weekends.

I would like to get into sports.

I like to crochet and do other crafts.

I want to go to church, but they're too busy here.

I bought my stereo with my own money.

I would like to have a friend. I don't really have one.

I get to choose where to go out and eat.

There isn't much to do in the community.

I would like to have more friends.

We can go out any time we please. Going out is the most important thing.

It's people that make me happy.

 

Objective 2b: Expand and improve the Peer Support Project by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective.

NBRC Consumer Advocate, has created five Consumer Self-Advocacy Groups in 2001. Every group is different and each group is working on their own issues. For example, one group is writing a company to prevent their company truck from blocking access to the consumers’ workplace. The current group locations are PACE Plaza in Fairfield, PACE in Suisun, PACE in Vallejo, Becoming Independent in Santa Rosa, and NVSS in Calistoga.

Objective 2c: Improve community education on self-determination by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective.

NBRC and Vendor Best Practices provided a training on The History of the Civil Rights Movement for People with Disabilities.

NBRC hosted a Self-Determination Forum on April 9th and 10th, 2001.

NBRC formed a Self-Determination Focus Group and email group.

Objective 2d: Pilot one or more self-determination project by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective.

NBRC has initiated self-determination projects and held a Self-Determination Focus Group meeting in October. This group is drafting NBRC Self-Determination policies to be approved by the NBRC Board of Directors in 2002.

Objective 2e: Identify the unique needs of the aging population by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed-ongoing objective.

NBRC held an Aging Population Focus Group meeting and created an Aging Population Focus Group email list. See Focus Group objectives in Appendix.

2 0 0 2

Self Determination Support Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Increase consumer and family self-determination opportunities.

Objective 1a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/02.

Baseline: 7 surveys

Objective 1b: Improve consumer self-advocacy awareness by 12/31/02.

Baseline: Five Consumer Groups.

NBRC Consumer Advocate plans to increase Consumer Self-Advocacy Groups from five to eleven by 12/31/02.

Goal 2: Increase shareholder satisfaction with transportation services.

Objective 2a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/02.

Baseline: 7 surveys

Objective 2b: Improve awareness of consumer transportation issues by 12/21/02.

Baseline: Two initiative.

NBRC Consumer Advocate will continue participation on the Napa County Paratransit Coordinating Council

NBRC Consumer Advocate will begin attending the Sonoma and Solano County Paratransit Coordinating Councils

To learn more or to get more involved: For Consumer Self-Advocacy Groups, please contact Randy Kitch at (707) 256-1162 or email randyk@nbrc.net. For the Self-Determination Focus Group, please contact Richard Ruge at (707) 256-1271 or email richardr@nbrc.net.

 

G . S E R V I C E P L A N N I N G A N D C O O R D I N A T I O N

2001

Service Planning and Coordination Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve shareholder satisfaction with intake processes.

Objective 1a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 9 surveys since 1996.

Selected Intake Survey comments:

1. Interview with the NBRC Assessment Counselor:

Very professional, yet provided a comfort.

Very informative, caring person. She’s great!

Thorough and compassionate.

Sincere in her approach with our daughter and very knowledgeable.

2. How much time it took for eligibility to be completed:

3/01 until 6/01 = 3-4 months.

Still in process.

Didn’t take too long!

3. Evaluations (if any) that were done to help determine eligibility for Regional Center Services:

None taken.

Complete explanations/processes provided.

Meet with NBRC doctor. I’d say interview was successful.

Would like to have the results.

4. Information shared with you about the eligibility decision:

Yes.

We have not heard this yet.

My son is eligible, but we’re waiting for case worker to contact us.

5. Information shared about other available resources in the community:

We have not talked with our son’s North Bay social worker yet.

None yet, but would like information.

I had great information.

6. Overall, how satisfied were you with the eligibility determination process at NBRC:

She told me about CCS, transportation, dentist and respite.

I’m satisfied, but is very slow going. We began this process in May or June - it’s now September and we’re still waiting for a case worker.

Slow, not kept informed as to progress of application/evaluation status.

Satisfied, but again disappointed with time. My son’s school is not doing anything for him. They have been waiting for what you have to say about what help he will get.

It went well this time. In the past we were dropped from your services. I feel your categories are too rigid for eligibility and people who really need help can’t get it.

Okay. They were all nice and sweet and made me and my daughters comfortable there!

I cannot answer any of this, since I have no idea what took place.

We know that considering our daughter for eligibility took time for your panel. We just hope the panel members do not feel their time was wasted. It is extremely important to us to investigate any and all services our daughter could benefit from, given her disabilities.

 

CQI SURVEY RESULTS FOR INTAKE CORE PROCESS

 

July-December, 2001

 

Responses to the Intake team’s CQI survey from applicants/families who have recently come through the intake process during the July-December, 2001 period are summarized in the following charts.

The results for overall satisfaction are summarized for those clients found eligible for services by office in Chart 1.

Chart 1

Survey Results for Eligible Clients

 

Very Satisfied

Satisfied

No Opinion

Dis-

Satisfied

Very Dis-

Satisfied

Total

Santa Rosa

2

5

1

0

0

8

Napa

15

5

0

0

0

20

Total

17

10

1

0

0

28

 

The results for overall satisfaction are summarized for those clients found not eligible for services by office in Chart 2.

Chart 2

Survey Results for Not Eligible Clients

 

Very Satisfied

Satisfied

No Opinion

Dis-Satisfied

Very Dis-Satisfied

Total

Santa Rosa

4

0

0

0

0

4

Napa

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

4

0

0

0

0

4

 

The results for eligible and not eligible clients are combined and are summarized in Chart 3.

Chart 3

Eligible and Not Eligible Clients Combined

 

Very Satisfied

Satisfied

No Opinion

Dis-

Satisfied

Very Dis-

Satisfied

Total

Santa Rosa

6

5

1

0

0

12

Napa

15

5

0

0

0

20

Total

21

10

1

0

0

32

 

 

In summary, 32 applicants returned surveys. Out of those 32 applicants, 31 (97%) were either very satisfied or satisfied. Out of those 31 applicants 21 (68%) were very satisfied with the remaining 10 applicants (32%) were satisfied. No applicant (0%) was either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. Of those applicants who were found eligible for regional center services, 27 out of 28 (96%) were either very satisfied or satisfied, with none (0%) being dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. Of those applicants who were found not eligible for regional center services, four out of four (100%) were either very satisfied or satisfied with none (0%) being dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. One applicant had no opinion.

The number of responses for each rating for the individual items on the survey is as follows:

1. Interview with the NBRC Assessment Counselor

Very Satisfied

Satisfied

Dissatisfied

Very Dissatisfied

Not Applicable

TOTAL

23

10

0

0

0

33

2. How much time it took for eligibility to be completed

Very Satisfied

Satisfied

Dissatisfied

Very Dissatisfied

Not Applicable

TOTAL

14

13

2

2

0

31

3. Evaluations (if any) that were done to help determine eligibility for Regional Center Services

Very Satisfied

Satisfied

Dissatisfied

Very Dissatisfied

Not Applicable

TOTAL

13

14

0

0

0

27

4. Information shared with you about the eligibility decision

Very Satisfied

Satisfied

Dissatisfied

Very Dissatisfied

Not Applicable

TOTAL

14

14

1

1

2

32

5. Information shared about other available resources in the community

Very Satisfied

Satisfied

Dissatisfied

Very Dissatisfied

Not Applicable

TOTAL

14

10

1

1

3

29

NBRC eligibility statistics for January to December 2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Objective 1b: Improve customer satisfaction with the Child and Adult Assessment Support Team (CAAST) referral, assessment and follow-up processes by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed – on going objective.

A major effort has gone into shortening the time it takes to get through the intake process in order to improve customer satisfaction and to comply with the new DDS guidelines that commenced July 1, 2000. To demonstrate our progress we have compared the average number of days it took from the date of the face-to-face contact to the date of eligibility determination during the time periods of 7/1/99 through 4/30/00 and 7/1/00 through 4/30/01. We counted only those individuals from both offices who had their initial face-to-face after July. For the 99/00 period, the average length of the intake process was 80 days. For the 00/01 period the average length of the intake process was 62 days. This was a considerable improvement.

We used the same time periods to compare the number of evaluations that have been done. The NBRC doctor completed 68 evaluations between July 1, 1999 and April 30, 2000. All other evaluations were done by outside vendors. CAAST performed 137 evaluations from July 1, 2000 through April 30, 2001. Please note: the average number of evaluations per month before September of 2000 was 7, but it increased to an average of 17 per month starting in October of 2000. By doing the evaluations ourselves we were able to shorten the time in which they are performed while providing a quality product. However, a barrier still exists in the amount of time it takes to get evaluations done for our Spanish-speaking consumers due to lack of resources. Follow-up Informing and Planning conferences are also now offered to each person whom we evaluate. Parents seem very pleased to have this opportunity.

 

Goal 2: Improve customer satisfaction with the case management process.

Objective 2a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 7 surveys since 1996.

Selected comments from the survey:

They have a lot of turnover. I wish the communication was better.

They keep leaving.

They need more money so they can help more.

I don't think they do a lot.

It's hard to get a hold of anybody.

She understands.

Paperwork. He really helps a lot.

She has always provided excellent service.

They would be there, if I needed anything.

She helps with problems.

She helped me get my job.

They are always available.

He talks to me.

They are very thoughtful people.

She tells me what my options are.

They listen.

She got me my Hoyer and my wheelchair. The old one didn't fit.

He helped with the doctors.

She goes above and beyond.

He's my friend.

Objective 2b: Improve consumer satisfaction with the IPP process.

2001 results: Complete – on going objective.

A NBRC staff person developed a Peer Support system to match consumers who know the IPP process with other consumers who are not as IPP knowledgeable.

A NBRC team created an IPP consumer satisfaction survey and developed a strategy to analyze and summarize the survey data at periodic intervals to continually improve the quality of NBRC IPP processes.

Objective 2c: Improve service delivery and case management services to Spanish and Tagalog speaking families by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Complete – on going objective.

A NBRC team hosted three Spanish-speaking workshops, modified a translation software to assist in Spanish translations, and regularly attended related community meetings.

A NBRC staff person reviewed and revised existing materials and created new materials for our Spanish-speaking consumers and families.

A NBRC team conducted a Consumer Citizenship and Voter Registration Drive in May, 2001.

Objective 2d: Improve regional center staff skills, knowledge, and abilities to obtain and coordinate needed services by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Complete – on going objective.

A NBRC team identified specific students who would benefit from a head start approach to adult day programming instead of remaining in a school program.

A NBRC team refined our Annual Health Status Review and Medical Face Sheet.

A NBRC staff person identified the unique needs of the aging population, specific to residential opportunities and choices.

A NBRC team created an Adult Resource Center and expanded the available resources on our internal computer network.

A NBRC team reviewed 188 caseloads to identify eligibility for generic benefits such as Veterans and Railroad Retirement.

A NBRC team conducted a Consumer Citizenship and Voter Registration Drive in May, 2001.

Numerous NBRC teams provided in-house trainings on NBRC policies, procedures and practices.

NBRC sponsored a training by Dr. Linda Perez which discussed the importance of reading infant stress cues and the importance of responding appropriately to those cues.

A NBRC staff person provided court-related information for CPC’s including contacts and procedures for working with the various local county courts.

NBRC updated transfer procedure manual and provided training for back-up staff persons to complete consumer transfers to other regional centers.

NBRC continued the development of teleconferencing for staff and community training.

Objective 2e: Increase number of face-to-face and telephone contacts with consumers and families by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Complete – on going objective.

Members of the Santa Rosa Transition Unit had an initiative to enhance communication and collaboration with schools and to improve parent advocacy. The primary means was to increase participation in IEP meetings and other school related meetings.

Objective 2f: Improve partnerships and collaboration with consumers, families and other community agencies.

2001 results: Complete – on going objective.

NBRC has the benefit of an active Vendor Advisory Committee and Family Support Group.

An NBRC staff person conducted an ADA training at the Sonoma County Jail.

NBRC teams met collaboratively with Sonoma, Napa and Solano County Mental Health Programs, APS, CPS and Ombudsman programs.

NBRC personnel coordinated with various agencies and individuals in support of disaster preparedness for individuals with special needs.

NBRC provided a Spring Fair to display NBRC initiatives to the public.

NBRC supported the Vendor Best Practices Training Program throughout the year; Training topics this year included: Medications, Read My Lips: Effective Communication with Verbal and Non-Verbal Consumers, Data Collection Made Simple and Relevant, Strategies for Dealing with Challenging Behavior, Autism: Characteristics and Communication, and Developmental Disabilities: History and Advocacy.

 

2002

Service Planning and Coordination Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve shareholder satisfaction with intake processes.

Objective 1a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/02.

Baseline: 9 surveys

Objective 1b: Improve customer satisfaction with the Child and Adult Assessment Support Team (CAAST) referral, assessment and follow-up processes by 12/31/01.

Baseline: One initiative by the Child and Adult Assessment Support Team titled: Improving Quality of Intake & Assessment Process.

Goal 2: Improve shareholder satisfaction with case management processes.

Objective 2a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/02.

Baseline: 7 surveys.

Objective 2b: Improve consumer satisfaction with the IPP process by 12/31/02.

Baseline: One initiative titled: Agency IPP Training.

Objective 2c: Improve service delivery and case management services to Spanish and Tagalog speaking families by 12/31/02.

Baseline: Three initiatives titled:

Filipino-American Awareness in Solano.

Empowerment of Hispanic Families.

Improving Services to Latino Community.

Objective 2d: Improve regional center staff skills, knowledge, and abilities to obtain and coordinate needed services by 12/31/02.

Baseline: Seventeen initiatives titled:

Special Education Survey.

Targeting Transitional Issues.

Improving Relationships w. Courts system & NBRC.

Day Program Transition Booklet distribution & Department of Rehabilitation Booklet creation.

Increased collaboration between ICF facilities, work-day program & CPC’s.

Analysis of the Individual Service Needs Review Process.

Generic Benefits Benefit Us II.

Mail Merge for the Adult Unit.

Improve Internal/External Communication.

New CPC Quick Index File.

Mutual Understanding Group (MUG).

Telephone System Documentation-Training.

SIR Electronic Resource Manual and Training.

Guidance Data Panel as effective case management and supervisory tool.

Forms Room Reorganization.

Supporting the Mentorship Proposal.

Unmet Need Process-increasing participation.

Objective 2e: Improve shareholder knowledge of available resources and training by 12/31/02.

Baseline: Two initiatives titled:

Continue to assist vendor community with Best Practices trainings.

Conduct at least one How to Navigate the System training in collaboration with the Family Support Group.

 

H. HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

2001

Health and Well-Being Goals and Objectives:

Goal 1: Improve Customer Satisfaction with Health Outcomes and Services

Objective 1a: Complete a consumer satisfaction survey by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 7 surveys since 1996.

Selected comments from the survey:

  • I wish I could go to my old doctor, but they closed the office.
  • I can't find a dentist.
  • My dentist talks to me and helps me not be uptight.
  • I had to wait six hours in the emergency room.
  • The allergy clinic helped me a lot.
  • I could go to the gym, but I don't like to exercise.
  • I swim and do sports.

Objective 1b: Complete a family satisfaction survey by 6/30/01 and 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. 9 surveys since 1996. See survey results in Appendix.

Selected comments from the survey:

  • More emphasis on prevention, i.e., screenings, blood testing on a regular basis rather than on an as-needed or requested basis.

  • We have to practically beg to get reimbursed for services. Getting claims paid is a time-consuming headache.

  • My family member is very overweight - needs help in diet, exercise, motivation for health and fitness.

  • I wish there were Autism experts in this area especially with regard to medication, i.e., Child Psychiatrists or Developmental Pediatricians.

  • Too many beneficial services not provided by agencies or covered by insurance. Turf battles, constant jockeying for position to be last in line to pay for anything between CCS, Regional Center, Medi-Cal and insurance. Inept staff abound.

  • I have trouble answering these questions as I have my family member on my health plan. It is very expensive, and she can or both of us can be dropped any time. My family member will be on Medi-Cal, Medicare. I don’t know what kind of care she will get. This is a very big worry for me.

  • Getting special medications approved by our HMO is difficult.

  • Waiting time for approval for therapists, specialists, etc.

  • Shorter waiting periods, minimally invasive treatment. Choices!

  • Having a dentist in the county with specialized practice for the developmentally disabled. I have to take him to San Francisco.

  • There seems to be a shortage of available physicians and dentists that will serve DD patients. When we moved here, many would not accept new patients.

  • Mostly I feel very anxious about increasing premium cost (Kaiser) and we do not have group insurance via employer. Health care in Sonoma County is also deteriorating and although we have no acute needs, overall it is becoming unaffordable. Medi-Cal does help with some things, NBRC with others. We are always playing "hot potato" with who will pay. We couldn’t get dental for our child until this year. We've paid out of pocket the past year. Specialized therapies with practitioners of our choosing is limited especially for psych and counseling. Special PT, OT, "out of standard" services.

 

Objective 1c: Complete a health care provider survey to identify potential improvement areas by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. Individual satisfaction surveys were completed by health service professionals for each of the following trainings. Data collection supports a high degree of satisfaction with training topics and presenters.

NBRC telemedicine grant with USC-UAF includes the training of health care professionals (including nurses, psychologists and physicians). Health care professionals are able to receive continuing education units by attending these trainings. Trainings have been held in both the Napa and Santa Rosa offices. This past year we have sponsored approximately six trainings. Subjects have included: sexual abuse prevention, neuro-developmental disabilities, measurement techniques for Feeding Clinic evaluations, and treating behavioral challenges in the early intervention population.

Regional Center clinicians and other vendorized health professionals have participated in weekly teleconferences with Stanford University rehabilitation specialists conducting evaluations for augmentative communication devices as part of a two-year grant project.

A two-day training sponsored by the UC Davis MIND Institute was presented to staff and community-based health professionals in our Napa office in August 2001.

Objective 1d: Improve consumer, family, and provider understanding of proper nutrition, exercise, and health education for routine medical care by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. See Wellness Team report in Appendix for further details.

Objective 1e: Improve disaster preparedness for consumers by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. See Regional Special Needs Disaster Preparedness Focus Group report in Appendix for further details.

Objective 1f: Improve preventative dental care for consumers by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. See Wellness Team report in Appendix for further details.

Objective 1g: Improve medical monitoring in high-risk areas for consumers by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. See Wellness Team report in Appendix for further details.

Objective 1h: Improve Medical review and diagnoses for consumers with dual diagnosis by 12/31/01.

2001 results: Completed. See Wellness Team report in Appendix for further details.

Objective 1i: Increase collaboration with agencies to prevent abuse